Originally Posted by CONF iture
Yes, the atmosphere was calm.
The reports states that the wind was 5kt at the time of the accident. Comparison of the recorded airspeed and groundspeed shows variations of +/- 2kt of airspeed that can only be explained by variations of the wind speed.
How do you explain again such confusion in the report ... ?
The last value of 34 feet is obviously a typographical error and should read 24 ft as shown in the CEV print of DFDR data. In addition, the recorded accelerometer data show that the airplane cannot possibly have climbed 10 ft in one second between TGEN 333 and TGEN 334.
