PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Farnborough Airspace Proposal
View Single Post
Old 9th Mar 2014, 18:43
  #114 (permalink)  
Fitter2
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,141
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Hi MJ


I did not ignore anything. The definition of the service is clear


the controller provides specific surveillance derived traffic information and issues headings and/or levels aimed at achieving planned deconfliction minima
If you are saying that the service provider can refuse to provide this information unless the aircraft in receipt of the service accepts that it may be 'refused entry' into a section of Class G airspace, then so be it. This makes it even more important that the airspace in question remains Class G, and other GA aircraft are no forced into a further squeezed choke point with the attendant increase in collision risk.


(by the way, the abbreviation for 'you are' is 'you're'.)
Fitter2 is offline