Hmm, I too have never seen published criticism of an SI by a serving member of any appointment. Sign of the times?
As has been said many times, there are no winners and whilst the main points have been covered ad nauseum, these inquiries are tasked to look at everything and RAFAT's standard practices obviouly did not find favour with the Board.
Due to their somewhat unique role, this may or may not be acceptable to Duty Holders further up the food chain. The Board have done their job subjected to intense media scrutiny (including this very forum), so that is additionally difficult.
NB I spent three years as an SFSO on a (nominally) fast jet station in a previous life, so find the Board's conclusions unsurprising.
THERE ARE NO WINNERS