PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - UH-72 to Rucker ? What's the Army thinking?
Old 22nd February 2014 | 15:36
  #40 (permalink)  
Stinger10
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Sky
No offense, but I think you guys are missing the point. IFS or no IFS, Army flys between 80-100k flight hours a year. That will not change dramatically ovet the next 10 years and by using the UH-72 it will cost , at a minimum, 150-200% more per hour. The will literally spend all the savings of not replacing the Kiowa on flight hours at Rucker? Why ? Because the UH-72 needs a home? They will also be, with the exception of German 105s and now EC-135s, the only ones to employ an EC-145 as a primary trainer. There has to be a smarter more pragmatic solution.

Last edited by Stinger10; 10th March 2014 at 15:31.
Stinger10 is offline  
Reply