PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - UH-72 to Rucker ? What's the Army thinking?
Old 19th Feb 2014, 04:11
  #25 (permalink)  
Um... lifting...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Below Escape Velocity
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who can claim Bell doesn't support the 206's? Bell support of its products is still #1 in world.

Basic training is suppose to be how to fly not manage glass.
The maintenance personnel at NAS Whiting Field can claim that. And do.

We've all read the R&W surveys and know what they say.

Many people agree with you on the purpose of basic training, however, those who are determining future fleet direction are typically not among them. That may be unpleasant to hear, but it happens to be supported by the facts.

If you believe the future of Naval or Army helicopter training remains a steam-gauge 206, go ahead and float that proposal.
Um... lifting... is offline