Fun though this discussion is, I have not learnt anything.
I already knew that it was illegal for the gyrocopter to land on an occupied runway, and I am well versed in the Rules of the Air and the ANO.
My question was rather different, and I refer you to the thread title
I am keen to hear why Duxford feels duty bound to treat its two runways with enormous care, whilst all manner of simultaneous operations were occurring at Turweston.
I ask again:
"So was Turweston breaking the rules, or has Duxford misunderstood the rules, or is there another answer?"