Hear, hear, cuefeye.
Tuc,
I have often asked the question whose job it is to reconcile differences between these reports and demonstrable fact. Also, who takes the next step when the SI/BoI stops abruptly and fails to ask the next logical question, which would reveal the truth. The answer is, the MAA. But they abrogate their responsibility.
I agree. My point was that the SI has fulfilled its remit (very well, in my view). It is the next step that you (correctly in my view) are questioning. But they are two separate issues. Had the Panel raised the issues you mention they would be firmly told to wind their necks in. That was my point.