I did read every page of the report. The accident would not have happened if the crew had not busted the minimums. Which bit of that is not clear to you, or the investigators (if they happen to be reading).
So you can say with certainty that following the application of -9% torque on the No. 1 engine and the left roll followed by the subsequent hard roll to the right which resulted in the loss of control had happened at minima it would not have crashed? Please could you do my lotto numbers when you get a chance? What rubbish.
The crew on both approaches 1 and 2 descended below minima to 101ft on approach 1 and to 91ft on approach 2 - It was a case of multiple factors combining on the 3rd approach that caused this accident not a single one.