PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Challenger crash at KASE
View Single Post
Old 1st Feb 2014, 17:34
  #336 (permalink)  
roulishollandais
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: france
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop Bank, Leasing, Insurer, Owner, Operator, and Air safety

True... or half-true : The first advantage for operators to use leased aircrafts is to share in two different companies the benefits for the owner and the losses for the operators !
Sometimes the fisc does not accept to consider they are independant : exemple Euralair and Avialair and it may lead to a Criminal Court

Air Safety Regulations have been writen in the idea that responsability concerns the company who makes money : in the former time it was the operator, today it is the owner in the leasing system. Insurers make money too.

Regulations must be adapted to protect Air Safety and say that these who get money have responsibility. Immatriculations too often are lying. So inquiries are modified in case of crash.

When the owner is a Bank it is still worse, because a Bank does not know how to do an aircraft safe, their profession is to take a percent on every penny, cent passing in their hands. They have no technical skills.

It seems the question may be put on the table of discussion now and fora.
roulishollandais
roulishollandais is offline