Notably, once things had settled, it was only Asseline who kept insisting that the aircraft had failed him - nothing was heard from his first officers since. If the crew as a whole had such faith in Asseline's position, why did they not put their names to his book? Why did his lawyers never pursue the fact - laid out clearly in the BEA's report - that the airline's standard of operations were not fit for purpose in this case? I reckon SNPL union politics have a lot to answer for here - I don't think they ever had his interests at heart, and instead saw him as a tool in their ongoing vendetta with Airbus.
However
certain details are surprising
translate.google.com
The two flight recorders are recovered intact but disappear the same night, transported by the director of the DGAC, a Daniel Tenenbaum without counsel Mulhouse Jean WOLF considered it appropriate to affix court sealed !
The following evening, Monday, June 27, all authorities will conclude the innocence of the accident airplane charging multiple pilot errors. The plane was flying too slowly, too low and the gas were delivered too late. All control systems of the aircraft worked perfectly. A survey at least expeditious ...
As per design