Sehr interessant
This thread of late seems to be plagued by a deficit of listening. Of this, I mean that there simply is no actual - actual - actual disagreement between those who cite the lack of injuries or fatalities (true); the CLEARLY ERRONEOUS nature of a wrong airport landing (true); the need to understand precisely which slice of Swiss cheese the hole appeared in (or slices) (true); what the exact x-axis, y-axis co-ordinates are for the hole or holes (true); whether changes still spreading and reverberating through civil air transport (like Magenta line stuff) in their statistical central tendency will exacerbate the causes (once they are identified to an NTSB probable cause standard) (true); and those who advocate thought process expenditure on irrelevancies, redundancies, or repetitions. For example, were either of the pilots going commando (true), or wearing magenta-lined drawers (false)?