Pitts, Your reference can hardly balance anything in this particular part of the thread as "
The aircraft was examined at the accident site" and no transportation for further investigation was involved!
I think the interesting point in the report on the 135 accident is the specific value given to the amount of fuel recovered.
All the Glasgow report is stating, is the
fact that 95 litres were drained from the ac. If people want a conspiracy or some other thing to look at, why don't you all ask the question, 'Why it is that exactly 95 litres were drained, not 94, not 96 but exactly 95!!
Kind of backs up my previous thought that the 95l was all they either had access to, or the capability to take, at the initial examination;
Oooo, are those 3.5 litre sample jars they are using?
