Originally Posted by glofish
I uphold my suspicion that (taking into account the above) the “advice” (and subtle pressure) from the company to continue, paired with the less strong position (protection) of today’s skippers leads to more biased decisions, more risk taking.
And I would agree with you 100% here.
This thread however is about a single engine failure on an EK380 - it's been brought to a totally different level here - and the subsequent continuation of flight for several hours. WHAT is the big deal?
The RISK was assessed by the experienced PIC.
Originally Posted by glofish
An engine failure remains a serious malfunction!
It is. I have had the experience a few times thanks, but all in pistons.... The point is that it is how the rest of the flight is managed isn't it?