PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Entering autos: discussion split from Glasgow crash thread
Old 16th Dec 2013, 17:09
  #209 (permalink)  
500guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon, US
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want to comment about the "dead mans curve" as some of you have called it.
We happen to fly 500s doing poweline work, so I keep very close stats on all of the accidents within our industry.

In the 35 years our industry has been operating there have been 17 power losses by powerline construction/repair contractors on the line (either on patrol, below 200feet or in several cases in a hover on the line. In at least 3 cases they were bonded to the wire. All were Hueges 500s, essentialy the only ship used for this type of work in the US. 2 Accients were listed were AUS, the rest are USA.

Pilot Inuries Accident Reference

Minor WPR12LA022

Serious WRP12LA328

None NoReport – Aircraft not substantially damaged

None NoReport – Aircraft not substantially damaged

None NoReport – Aircraft not substantially damaged
Serious SEA07LA135

None MIA93LA055
Serious NYC88LA083

Serious See ATSB Report
None NYC99LA055

None LAX99LA245
Serious MIA99FA158

Minor CEN13FA075
None CHI00FA110

None CHI96 FA099

None No Report – Aircraft not substantially damaged
Minor CEN13FA075

These accidents are literally a worst case scenario for engine failure 100-200' agl low or no airspeed and tons of obstructions, yet in every case the pilot survived.
5 serious injuries
3 minor injuries
9 no injuries
(There were a couple fatalities of lineman on the platform, or carried has HEC)
Also as you can see, in at least 4 cases, they didn't even bend tin.
Please stop perpetuating the theory that a engine failure in the avoid curve is certain death or serious injures.


500guy is offline