OK, I'm going to duck for cover after I post this, but....
There were reports that the DFDR and CVR didn't jibe - that there was a 3 second discrepancy. The implication was that the DFDR had been 'altered' to 'remove' a 3 second delay in the engines responding to the GA command
. Basically, that there was a cover-up of some shortcoming in the aircraft and blame it on the pilot.
Based on an 'Air Disasters' program about the crash, the pilot is still claiming he was framed, pointing at the 3 second gap.
So, knowing relatively little about this accident (and most of what I do know is based on the press and TV reports), is there anything to the alleged gap in the data?
