This question goes out to the legal brains reading this thread.
If we forget for a moment that Flybe have a global workforce, not a base, based, workforce. Policy, custom and practise of LIFO, regardsless of seat fleet or base.
In pure employment law where do we stand on the 3 different scenarios that are proposed in Flybe's redundancy program?
1. Complete base closure
2. Complete removal of one type of aircraft at a mixed fleet base.
3. Reduction in number of one aircraft type at a mixed fleet base.
To answer a few questions asked previously
I think this issue effects the majority of UK pilots. If you look at the 3 scenarios above it tests most of the available options. So I believe this forum is more appropriate than a Flybe specific forum.
I agree that for a wider (than Flybe) audience polisy F and some more detail would be useful. I'm pretty stretched at the moment, can any one help with that?