Sorry to keep it going but anyway....
Hooperfly-
"let the papers know about it"
With 1347 views I suspect they are already aware as has been the case previously on this forum.
Far from looking for sensation as a fellow airline employee I am vindicating the opposite.
The numbers speak for themselves, 1347 people viewed
your post, only eight of which responded albeit two of those in a negative manner.
If you wish to "establish the facts" why not explain who you are and ring up the airline, although as BOAC points out it is difficult to see why you would need to do so given your credentials, I hope the "facts" gained were worth it.
Ratarsed
No it is not unreasonable to find out what happened, it is the manner in which it was done that I am questioning.
Thankyou for those pearls of wisdom, your patronising manner assumes that I have no knowledge of the subject matter and yet YOU accuse me of arrogance.
I am well aware of the implications of engine failure (and worse) having experienced the situation several times within my company, and indeed I have debriefed crews after the event , indeed it is personal experience that drives my reaction.
Yes I am sure that this was not a non event for the crew involved , and I am equally sure that they would not want it plastered all over pprune, as in the context of THIS FORUM a non event occurred.
Perhaps in future I will post an account of everthing that occurs in my company (90 aircraft) , from hydraulic leaks to tailstrikes (all of which can be perceived as "interesting and noteworthy"), and see how the crews involved feel about it.