solotk
You might as well be an embedded reporter for all the use your information is.
Did you intend that your opening remarks would be mis-leading? Obviously they are - 'cos you ain't there are you. Ok some of your regiment is but that is not the same thing.
However, be that as it may. The facts appear to be that the Iraqis want this war. As per the article I quote in my original post. Why would you ASSUME that article to be wrong? I had NOT assumed that your opening remarks were until we found out differently???????
The problem is that there are far too many reporters as I understand it (some 2000 I seem to recall). A certain recipe for disasterous reporting. Flower the ingredients, add a little spice, a little more sugar or lemon and you are on a winner.
I think I will stick will Al Lockwood and Central Command. Much much less ambuguity.