J'accuse: Accusé BEA, Levez-Vous!
Without the original and complete DCVR, we'll not be able to fully explain this crash.
Fragmented information relayed by the BEA isn't grounded on any evidence.
In this situation it's difficult to estimate to what extent the provided details agree with the facts, especially that the BEA rejects certain hypotheses without giving reasons such as on Bonin's licence which it backtracked in its 3rd intermediate report as opposed to the 1st interemediate report.
How does it explain its change of heart?
Now, the Judicial Expert's report provides more DCVR but too many pieces are missing from the puzzle.
New ECAM Warnings:
BEA FAULT
BEA REPORT 1 + BEA REPORT 3 DISAGREE
Last edited by Winnerhofer; 28th Nov 2013 at 16:52.