Any company can always say at a future date that based on recent events, they had to change their pland.
Well yes, thats why terms and conditions are in place. These often say that the company can change their schedules.
Regional connectivity can be delivered by a direct route to one location in the UK (eg Manchester hub) followed by a change onto somewhere else. Not great for passengers, but as long as *at least* one route to Inverness is maintained, strictly speaking it counts as regional connectivity.
Fair enough, lets hope that other carriers flock to INV then to pick up these routes if this turns out to be the case.
Cynical perhaps, but given Mrs Johnson is a lawyer, I've heard all too often how what appears to be reassuring, when push comes to shove, is actually meaningless
the only thing it confirms for people in Inverness is that the airline will maintain at least one UK route to Inverness for the time being and that anyone whose flight is cancelled will get a refund.
Maybe you are overthinking things then......speculating on something that has not yet happened. As far as we know so far is that the routes will continue as normal apart from LGW.
I guess, if one wanted to be picky, could Flybe not press legal action against you for making a statement which could damage their reputation
if potential passengers were put off booking after reading your comments. Suggesting that booking tomorrow for a flight in April to BHX for example will get cancelled and refunded nearer the date of travel....? Does Mrs Johnson deal with many cases of slander?
