PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - why aren't Motor Gliders more popular?
View Single Post
Old 12th Nov 2013, 12:18
  #13 (permalink)  
Prop swinger
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: anywhere
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
No, I am right.

99.99% of what the CAA used to call SLMGs in the UK & Europe are EASA aircraft & fall under EASA's rules. The CAA's nomenclature is redundant. If it has a non-retractable engine & a non-retractable propellor it is a TMG, everything else is a glider / sailplane.

You can fly your Falke on your EASA TMG, you do not need an NPPL(SLMG) & there ain't no such thing as an EASA Sport Pilot Licence so you won't need one of them.

Originally Posted by Genghis the Engineer
I agree that a single motorglider rating would be better than the (apparent) current approach - and realistically it should be just differences training on SSEA or SEP: maybe a bit more training and a skill test for glider or microlight pilots.
The old / current rules are minimal training + check flight to fly TMGs on a PPL(SEP), or skills test if you actually want TMG hours to count towards SEP revalidation. New / EASA rules are minimal training + skills test to add TMG to LAPL(A), PPL(A), LAPL(S) or SPL. I don't see what is so complicated.
Prop swinger is offline