NO,
ad homines 
Perhaps if one cannot be bothered to stay current in understanding the manual, one should not be doing the job.
ad homines again ! Errare humanum est. Our threads are showing all along that understanding the manual is not so easy. And changing systems or only gains would need to have a new name, or version number not just the date to avoid confusions. Changing systems must be very very seldom.
Could you suggest a name for the non human part of systems (FBW and what you call automation in your Country) please? Untill your suggestion I shall call it "butterfly"
to don't risk to be
