I attended the AGM of a flying club not long back. Most of the discussion revolved around a proposal to deny social members a full vote at future AGMs, a vote was to be taken. Apparently some flying members were afraid that they might be outvoted by social members, regarding the running of the club - even though the former outnumber the latter by about 4 to 1!
I pondered where all these concerned flying members actually were on that evening - only about 50 people in all were in attendance.... out of some 300 or so.
I've been a member of said club since the late 1980s. Initially I was a full flying member but for the last few years I've stopped flying from there and taken a social membership instead. I'm still a regular customer of the restaurant and try to support all the social events, if nothing else for a bit of loyalty. As I pointed out to one flying member, who said he didn't recognise many people - the social members patronise the restaurant so it remains profitable (and available to all) whereas the flying members turn up, and fly off elsewhere and eat at someone else's airfield restaurant.
Since becoming a social member I had always previously abstained from voting at any AGM, but of course this time I made sure I cast my vote. Thankfully common sense prevailed and the proposal was defeated.
It's possibly the "antisocial" flying club member who prefers not to give visitors much of a welcome because they simply see any visitors walking in as a negative thing.