hval,
Just my 3 penn'orth purely to make you think.
Bearing in mind the 200 word limitation, I would leave out the 3 sub questions. Your overall goal is to impart a view on 'what makes the Red Arrows such an effective team'. You then give a very good series of reasons to answer the question. Breaking down the detail into 3 specific sub questions is a good idea but not when you are word limited.
'What makes the Red Arrows special' and 'What qualities do the team have' can really be combined to answer your original point.
'What makes the team different from similar teams' should be omitted because this would require too much detail and too many words in the time available. I would leave comparisons with the other famous teams out of your argument altogether as they all see themselves as special and the best and in all probability, they probably all share the same qualities.
Over to you though for the final article.