All speculation and hogwash.
Really?
This article basically repeats information I was told, about 10 -11 years ago.
The wind change resulting in a tailwind take off, the swerve to the side of the runway and what caused that swerve, the runway light damage, the ingestion of FOD from the runway lights.
Certainly no more speculation and hogwash than the theory that piece of metal from the DC10 caused the crash.
There's certainly plenty of evidence to back up the story as posted by T28D