SH,
<<idiots .... infringing CAS and causing chaos!!!! >>
And more NATS employees hurtling abuse on forums.
That wasn't me.
All your other points seem to be addressed at CAA rather than NATS.
Airspace design and classification is governed by CAA.
2) For airspace to re-designed to permit VFR aircraft to safely enter it.
Yes, and I can quote many meetings I've attended where other airspace users (i.e. IFR operators using London airports) don't want to permit VFR access, and cite safety concerns about the airspace design and ATC procedures in the USA.
They are the ones who really don't want the mid-air collision.
Really? I'd suggest that all airspace users feel that way. Unless you are suggesting you have a lower safety threshold?
But to keep out aircraft just because you think they're not paying anything for it is just extremely poor.
Who is keeping aircraft out because they don't pay? Class D CTRs have VFR transits. VFR is not permitted in Class A CTAs. If you want VFR access to what is now a Class A CTR you need to talk to CAA, not NATS.
Please go and visit somewhere like Farnborough, and talk to the LARS controllers there about the 'duty of care' they are lumbered with. For better or worse the UK is not the USA in terms of airspace/ATC. It's no good just haranguing the coal-face ATCOs for 'banning VFR flights'.