PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - C-17. Is it really that good?
View Single Post
Old 19th Mar 2003, 19:27
  #34 (permalink)  
Trumpet_trousers
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Trumpville; On the edge
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ABIW:

Are these wafer thin pax then? Or do you just increase the diff. to get the extra width for the seats in the 108 pallet width? Surely you don't let the poor old pax sit at an angle by fixing the seatlegs to the -4A beams? Or do you?

BTW: Nice article in the Times yesterday re: spelling on CVs - not suggesting for a moment that you need to change jobs, merely that it has some relevance regarding the impact of written work to the reader if it is riddled with spelling mistakes.....just a thought. (Oh hang on, you appear to have found your sp%ll ch#ck$r!)

ICS boxes......no tangible benefit over the K then?

Vertical Clearance......no tangible benefit over the K then?
(Could/would cause clearance problems for MSPs)

Vibration.......I wonder if the K fleet has to get Gp authority to fit full seats? No, thought not........no tangible benefit over the K then?

Oh, they fixed the door problem.......hooray!

(Yawn)

Last edited by Trumpet_trousers; 19th Mar 2003 at 19:50.
Trumpet_trousers is offline