PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - JAL orders 31 A350's
View Single Post
Old 11th Oct 2013, 15:05
  #18 (permalink)  
DozyWannabe
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Boeing neglected to specify that they shouldn't burst into flames instantaneously ?
Admittedly, that did make me chuckle.

But in all seriousness it seems that the operating environment specified was too narrow - after all, if the units hadn't passed Boeing's and the FAA's requirements and testing then they wouldn't have been fitted to the aircraft. Conditions faced on the line seem to have been outside the boundaries of the original spec.

The point being that no matter which company was contracted to develop and build the battery systems, if the spec was the same then they'd have still had the same problems vis. battery fires.

Last edited by DozyWannabe; 11th Oct 2013 at 15:08.
DozyWannabe is offline