Gents,
As I don't have Athens access, I can't afford to hit-and-miss - so was wondering if someone might point me in the direction of one or two good studies or evidence-based articles regarding which checklist technique (specifically, "read-and-do" vs. "flow-followed-by-challenge-response-checklist") works best under what circumstances.
My intuition tells me that "read-and-do" is disastrous for normal ops, but works very well when we are less familiar with the subject, i.e. non-normals and perhaps supplementary procedures. Can't sell intuition, though - so will need some scientific data to confirm or deny that 6th sense...
In advance thanks for your assistance
