To all:
767300er is bitter and twisted because he got furloughed first, being post-TWA-in-bankruptcy date of hire. He thinks he would have been better off if AA had never gotten involved with him, when actually the reverse is true. Many of the analysts feel that the purchase of TWA is one of the major debt-burdens and lease burdens dragging AA down. It was an extremely ill-advised move, for which someone in management will one day be held accountable - just not yet....
Meanwhile, 767300ggrrrr whines about his lot in life; grow up, matey....pathetic, see-through performance. TWA would have been the first under, long-ago, without AA's intervention. You blame AA for your woes - in actual fact it was your decision to join TWA when they were already in bankruptcy that has gotten you where you are. Why didn't you go to a then-successful carrier earlier? Why did you stay with them? Did you have applications in at other majors, hmmm? You were happy to start at the bottom if you'd been called for interview, no doubt. We're not getting the whole story, are we? I think you're applying to EK; if you are, you had better change your attitude - they'll not want a grumble-weed on the team...
