PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Name and shame
Thread: Name and shame
View Single Post
Old 24th Sep 2013, 16:51
  #10 (permalink)  
glofish
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jack s....:

The profits climbed in sum, but declined in terms of percentage.

This means the yield dropped. Now it was said that the 380 might consume a little more, relative to the T7, but its yield was supposed to be better ..... Since its inauguration however, the overall company yield dropped and our profit share vanished.

Just a coincidence or unfavourable circumstances? Or could it be that there's too much wrong aircraft deployed to the wrong places?
I wonder what would have been bullied out by the then strong Airbus fraction if the same had happened when the many T7ERs arrived ..... but we got some nice bonuses then.

To the above article:
Funny how Timmy's statement sounds very similar to what i predict for a long time now. The 60$/120$ analogy for the old 4-legged 345 could translate into a 120$/180$ guillotine for the new 4-legged 748 and 380.

Last edited by glofish; 24th Sep 2013 at 16:57.
glofish is offline