However, does the existing sim training cover only the legally-required minimum for proficiency checks? Or is it possible to have additional time, if sim slots are available?
It IS possible. Indeed it 's what I do. Pure training (S92 at present) on instrument approach procedures. However, in my opinion - which many here have heard repeatedly from me - pilots do not get enough pure training. It is often included in the OPC, but as HC has indicated, they are not always in a receptive frame of mind when checking is the aim.
I recently tried to start monthly groundschool sessions, just to answer the sort of technical questions which are always cropping up. The pilots were very enthusiastic about the idea - but couldn't be released from the flying programme, there were no "spares".
Training doesn't earn revenue. It is therefore seen as a drain. Operators do what they have to, and if I get to do pure training sim sessions it's because of some fancy footwork by CTCs.
CAA
requires OPCs. I'd like to see the outcome of this incident being a
requirement, so many hours a year, for pure training.