Missing the point gents.
Pax think the aircraft is junk.
Pontificating on irrelevant technical details is not changing the minds of the pax.
If they don't fly, you don't get paid. (However smart you are)
As sassles said, sheilds down and look at the issues.
Of which there are 2.
Slf confidendce gone (and going further)
Aircraft capability, sort of ok, but not trusted by pax.
(Sort of ok meaning worse then GoM averages, which are not "good" )
You are heads up against pax who would gleefully burn these aircraft, whilst you are arguing that "it's what we have, what more do you want?"
What the SLF want is to get to work and get home with the same risk profile they have with flying to Londinium in a plank.
If you can't deliver what they want, they'll find a new company who can.
Poo poo what is going on now at your peril.