Sorry to say that was my impression CP. Not as a whole, as it was acknowledged that in some parts it was there to stay, but the impression I got was it was still under discussion in others (Triadic did you get this impression too?). Strict liability already being in force was mentioned, but only briefly.
Mind you it did allow the session to move on to other issues which might have otherwise been rushed through due to time constraints. Not being able to discuss other issues would have severely devalued the process.