VP I really don't know why you have your knickers in a twist over my 2 posts. The 2nd post of mine suggests better "co-ordination" between parties. What part of that do you disagree with? CHC flying, Bristow and Bond not. Someone asked why they thought that situation existed. I suggested that my feeling Bristow were not currently was to give more time process wise, wiggle room and set as accurate picture for investors.
WTF has any of that got to do with journalism? If you have a different view why Bristow are yet to return go ahead, let's hear it.
Beyond that the communication has been poor which is why the current mess exists.
For example one thing people will say about Fridays accident is "let's wait for the AAIB to do their job" by which rational we are still awaiting their view on the 225 despite Eurocopter and operators suggesting it's wrapped up.
Quite why you feel communication in some way detracts from the engineering I have no idea.
Last edited by Pittsextra; 25th Aug 2013 at 12:00.