I agree. It should be pass - you're good enough for us, welcome on board.
Or, fail - you're not quite up to grade this time. Try again in a while.
To offer 3 different contracts depending on "how you did on the day" seems a bit odd.
After all, what are they going to say to the regulator when an incident occurs?
"He was one of the better ones, so we gave him a real job. We can't believe he crashed"?
"He was average, so we gave him a real job with less stripes and less money. We are surprised he crashed"?
"He wasn't quite good enough in the group assessment or sim. But we gave him a shed load of debt and a temporary contract with no guarantee of where his next pay check was coming from. But, we cant really be surprised he crashed"?
Is this what the easy trainers and captains have "fought" for?
It's an obvious divide and conquer tactic.
Last edited by Narrow Runway; 23rd Aug 2013 at 19:57.