I agree with you old boeing driver...it isn't the cause
it is very odd that the NTSB would even mention the reduction in power...we normally reduce power as part of landing ( I know you know this OLD BOEING DRIVER).
and for lord spandex masher...I will revise my statement to only include the B737.
the runway is 7000' long followed by a dip into the water...if the landing occurred in the first third, adequate distance to stop remained...if landing was not to occur in this area, a go around should have been accomplished
this is a nutty one...I'm thinking that the words ''tunnel vision'' might be used at some point. only thinking how short the runway was instead of everything else in the duty of being a pilot.