Unless the CONTRACT stated that the terms and conditions of ST could not be changed then I suspect that your CONTRACT has not been breached. Indeed it probably states that ST privileges would be subject to the scheme rules extant at the time.
As I said before if BALPA will not touch it then it is probably a losing case and no amount of ire and the capitalisation of the word CONTRACT will help you in court. It seems this is a case of caveat emptor, put another way, you signed your contract, did you not understand or read the small print?
Last edited by Juan Tugoh; 6th Aug 2013 at 13:47.