PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - A320 : fuel efficient descent
View Single Post
Old 3rd August 2013 | 15:05
  #18 (permalink)  
J.L.Seagull
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Holding at DESDI
Sorry to be a bore and get serious again, but...

Here's something that I would like to throw into the mix:

Flying a COST INDEX is not about minimizing costs, or choosing the most cost effective way to fly. My understanding is that it makes estimating the cost of a flight more predictable. It gives an index (a factor, or a multiplier) for the bean counters to multiply the seat-kms flown.

So, it basically allows for more accurate profit/loss predictions (for the ops guys and the shareholders), which makes it easier to run the business.

For the CI concept to be used effectively, there should be a specific CI for each route and A/C type on that route. What say? Ideas?

Going back to the original post, OPEN DES's flight in post 8 is theoretically the best (while remaining legal)assuming that ATC and traffic would not interfere with your flight profile.

One more thing: You could do away with taxiing altogether though, and simply be towed to and from the runway! e-taxi and other such systems might actually become a reality sooner than we think!
J.L.Seagull is offline  
Reply