Can anybody tell me the cost per life saved by fixed ELTs in heavy transport aircraft? My strong suspicion is that not a SINGLE life has been saved and the cumulative cost over the last thirty years probably in the hundreds of millions of dollars. As well as the cost, the PROVEN increase in risk must be taken into account.
Just because a thing CAN be done doesn't mean that it is sensible that it should be done*.
In my view fixed ELTs MIGHT be justifiable in aircraft up to light twins but that is all.
Mangere1957,
As you suppose, the answer is NIL!
See my posts a few pages back, the in-service failure rate in accidents for fixed ELT is better (or worse)than 95%, or 100% in water.
They are simply not justified on any aircraft. The Australian research and results on the subject is very clear.
Fixed ELT are an utter waste of money, without regard to any additional risks they may introduce.
What other piece of equipment with a 95%+ failure rate is tolerated on an aircraft??
Tootle pip!!