While I agree it's low on the priorities, it does set a bad example.
TheStudentRoom is a very active webforum that has a sizable area dedicated to Armed Forces Careers and one of the recurring themes given to prospective wannabes is to largely ignore the RAF's own website when it comes to research for selection interviews. That hardly sets a good example for an organisation keen to get it's hands on the best and the brightest. Would KPMG, Deloitte et al allow such fundamental errors on their sites?
I remember the same RAF equipment glossy magazine being handed out for years with a picture of a KC-10 listed as a Tristar.
There are plenty of ex-Forces people around with time on their hands (or, in search of employment *cough cough*) who know this stuff. Is it beyond the wit of 'them on high' to use one or two?
Last edited by muppetofthenorth; 26th Jul 2013 at 17:37.