HC, what's the next layer below 'Daily Mail'?
Sorry PE, you are now officially on my ignore list, I have not occasioned someone more prone to exceedances of nonsense. I might concede a point if the ET 787 had the same point of failure - i.e. the Li Battery, but since the scorch mark is safely above the rear galley on the pressurised side of the rear dome I am pretty confident that the failures do not have a common source expect perhaps some escaped electrons in the wrong place. The battery is in the pointy thing at the back next to what is called the 'APU'. To provide a link which says "Plane Catches Fire On Runway" from Sky News, when the aircraft was on a remote stand only amplifies your shaky grasp of the factual. On the same scale maybe you want to prolong the 225s loitering on the ground because the TR gearbox may leak it's lubricant and seize - it's all part of the same transmission - tell you what, lets make EC redesign the entire transmission prior to RTF.