Ka6crpe
I've not explained my position here well enough, that is my fault.
I do not think not having the G/S on was the primary cause here, not in a million years.
My point is how do you explain it to a layman, someone who pays the money to get on the jet, or a judge.
There is a piece of technology that would have prevented this crash happening, but it was turned off. It wasn't broken, it was turned off with no contingency being put in place, because it would have been more expensive to put that contingency in place.
To me, it seems a highly difficult position to defend.
Last edited by course_profile; 11th Jul 2013 at 10:27.