PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Asiana flight crash at San Francisco
View Single Post
Old 10th Jul 2013, 17:10
  #1474 (permalink)  
Faire d'income
I call you back
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alpha quadrant
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the NTSB reported they indeed were asked by SFO ATC to maintain 180 to 5 miles
In a 777, while doing a visual, >300' high, after a long haul flight?

Add in anything else such as a full load or tailwind aloft, or a minor distraction such as a new type, and anyone would be at risk of a messy approach, in any airport.

All those pointing to a go-around as the blatantly obvious answer are of course correct. That can't be argued with in hindsight.

This will be all the brilliant desk pilots answer too.

However, put your mind back to when you are still on the first approach, following such a go-around, which of the following changes/improves?

Still a 777, still a visual, still probably the same daft ATC speed instructions, still after a long haul flight but now + a go-around. If there was a tailwind and/or a full load they won't change either. Your mind may try to persuade you that it will simply all happen again.

Before the hindsight, this weighs heavily on the mind too, especially when you are tired.
Faire d'income is offline