As a member of the lay public, I see no such evidence - perhaps those calling for this would care to provide some?
The interest of air safety improvement should be that BEA would work like scientists, conforming to science production laws. Everyhing is OPEN to criticizing eyes. That is not the case with BEA reports.
First of that, dangerously missing in BEA reports since "Europe" puts its nose there, are the raw data copy, and the names and adress of people who did the inquiry, analysis and reports.Missing too is the possibility to ask more precisions.
That is how science works. You may keep secrecy so long you are not publishing.Since you are publishing you must prove everything publicly and sign the work.
