PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread No. 11
View Single Post
Old 4th Jul 2013, 19:00
  #239 (permalink)  
DozyWannabe
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it's a diversion, then why does the document diverge into talk of conventional controls (with regard to stick-shaker), and erroneously claim that the BEA report puts the responsibility for the accident with the crew (which it does not)?
DozyWannabe is offline