but you're not the one who has been dealing with EASA or also had a visit from a EASA representative confirming this directly with the FTO.
No, but it's not my money on the line!
I also know in 5 other EASA states you must have the EASA licence issue requirements prior to test - because that's what Part FCL 1030 states!
I work with EASA on a daily basis and also been involved with a direct inspection from Cologne.
You on the other hand have a lot to loose, and more than just your money!
To be frank, I'm absolutely horrified that their word is enough - ask to see the correspondence - but then understand the correspondence itself is worthless if the AMC or GM hasn't been amended at :
EASA - Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material
Why not read the reference yourself and question them directly for the reference.
Remember as has been stated here some examiners are not conducting the tests when the applicant has less than the licence issue requirements - and the ATOs have nothing to loose - they've had your money after all - and then the applicant has been sent off to do 25 or so more hours hour building.
Don't say you weren't warned - I do hope your paying by credit card and can appeal the funds - but I guess you didn't get that in writing from the ATO either regarding their letter from EASA.
I'm sorry for my frustration but you certainly won't be the first or last to be caught out by this.
PS their not called FTOs anymore - they're are called ATOs.