Yup, bet old Jeffery loved that.
I like his
You will have noted from the evidence given by the Air Marshal that:
a) he has a rather woolly excuse for everything;
b) he pretends to have strong professional views concerning carrier operations - about which he knows very little, and
c) when he is stuck for an answer he hides behind a cloak of unnecessary and unseemly secrecy - which is there really to hide his ignorance (or is used to protect a vested interest?).
A very good example of the Air Marshal’s obfuscation and misleading statements is provided in his response to Question 35 by Ian Swales:
