PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 90 Day Rule - revisited
View Single Post
Old 16th Jun 2013, 06:57
  #105 (permalink)  
BEagle
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,858
Received 334 Likes on 116 Posts
As such under the old ANO there was no problem whats so ever doing the 3 as sole manipulator with someone else as PIC who is a none instructor.
Wrong. Ever since the advent of JAR-FCL, it has always been the case that, if out of recency, the 3 take-offs and 3 landings must be flown either as PIC (solo) or Dual (with FI). If Dual, the pilot regaining recency must be sole manipulator for at least 3 take-offs and landings, i.e. he/she cannot count demo or instructional take-offs and landings flown by the instructor.

I reall cannot understand why barrack room lawyers are trying to put any other interpretation on such a pretty straightforward requirement.
BEagle is offline