If you think that's bad, wait till it dawns on some bright overpaid spark that you can't have the other Terminals numbered non-consecutively.
Won't be the first airport (JFK's terminal refurb rotations) or other facility not to be consecutive or in an apparently logical format.
Now without consulting the wiki referee, I guess there are:
* Various M2's or local equivalents without an M1. There is also no M7.
* Several cities with subway lines 2,3 and so-on but no 1.
And so on. Now if anyone wants to start naming them we could keep the thread busy for a day or two, or we could get back to the key issues.
If the latter, I think the new survey won't be taken that seriously because it was commissioned by the airport. The first rule of
PR club is surely - do not conduct your own surveys, as they will always get you the answer you want, but nobody else will take them seriously.
Which is a shame, because, as with any development proposal, we rarely hear from the side of those who live near the airport, and
do want it to survive and thrive.